The expectations of the most famous generative artificial intelligence platforms, “ChatGPT” of the American company “OpenAI”, “Copilot” owned by the American technology giant “Microsoft”, and “Meta-AI” of the American technology and Internet services company “Meta” were disappointed. » In predicting the identity of the champion of the Arabian Gulf Football Cup “Gulf 26” in Kuwait, which strengthens the validity of the term “artificial intelligence hallucination”, which refers to giving confident answers despite their differences and being It is not based on a reliable source within the training, validation and testing data that it has undergone according to the definition of “Wikipedia”.
The three platforms combined failed not only to predict the identity of the champion, but also to predict that the title would be limited to Bahrain and Oman, which will meet in the final match this evening at Jaber Al-Ahmad International Stadium in Kuwait. Note that the most accurate predictions were provided by “Copilot”, which predicted that the Bahraini team would qualify for the final match, but added a false prediction that “Al-Ahmar” would win against its Qatari brother, a scenario that will not come true after “Al-Anabi” suddenly exited the tournament in the first round.
With the start of the tournament, Emirates Today used the three most famous platforms around the world to identify the qualifiers from the groups to the semi-finals and final, and the team that won the title, and the same questions were asked on the three platforms.
“GBT Chat” had predicted that Qatar would win the tournament after qualifying from the first group with the Emirates, defeating Saudi Arabia in the semi-finals, and crowning the title by defeating the Emirates in the final, while “Copilot” predicted that Iraq would win the title, by advancing with Bahrain from the group. The second was the victory over Qatar in the semi-finals and the title was decided against Bahrain in the final.
For its part, the “Meta AE” platform suggested that the Saudi team would win after rising from the second group with Iraq, and advance to the final match at the expense of “the Emirates or Qatar,” and that it would be crowned with the title at the expense of the “host” Kuwaiti team.
The specialist in cybersecurity and artificial intelligence, Saudi engineer Salem Al-Marri, confirmed that artificial intelligence platforms can be used in general in many fields, but they do not have accuracy in predictions when it comes to football, and that some platforms have previously provided wrong predictions.
Salem Al Marri told Emirates Today: “In football, expectations depend greatly on the general level of the team and its competitors in the group, and thus its path to the final match, in addition to the level of the local league for the team in question. For example, Qatar and Saudi Arabia are considered among the strongest leagues.”
He pointed out that the majority of scientific research emphasizes the importance of not taking the outputs of artificial intelligence seriously, and the importance of scrutinizing them, and added: “In my estimation, the predictions that Qatar, Saudi Arabia, or Iraq will win the title are not based on correct foundations, and that the three platforms made predictions based on answers in Websites.
. .
