The conflict between Julián Zucchi and Yiddá Eslava continues to generate controversy. The Argentine actor Julián Zucchi spoke out about the recent statements of his ex-partner, who accused him of not complying with his financial obligations. Through an extensive message, the artist denied the claims of the Peruvian actress and asked public opinion to pay attention to the evidence presented in court. “In total, there are S/ 8,000 per month that she controlled to cover the expenses of the home and our children. “I did not receive a single cent of that income, even though the assets are also mine,” Zucchi declared in a communication with the program. ‘America today’ .
Zucchi insisted that his only interest is to ensure the well-being of his children and defend his right to spend time with them. “The only thing I always asked for was shared custody because my children deserve quality time with both parents,” she emphasized.
Julián Zucchi makes a strong accusation about Eslava Yiddá
The Argentine actor not only denounced the exclusive management of rental income, but also highlighted that his ex-partner has fallen into contradictions in her public statements. According to Julián Zucchi, Yiddá Eslava initially claimed that he had never contributed financially to the support of his children, a statement he considered “defamation.” However, she later rectified and assured that there was a period of eight months in which she did not receive financial support.
“The inconsistency of his statements is evident. First he said that I had never spent a single time with him, and then he changed his version indicating that it was eight months. These statements affect not only my image, but also my relationship with my children,” said the actor, who emphasized that the relationship with Eslava should focus solely on shared parenting and not on financial disputes.
Julian Zucchi He also indicated that the assets in question, which generate S/ 8,000 per month, belong to both of them equally, so he considers that he should have participated in the administration of that income. As he explained, these resources were used to cover family housing expenses and the needs of the minors, but he did not detail whether he has initiated any legal process related to this matter.
