This Tuesday, December 17, Thony Valencia decided to speak publicly through a statement on his social networks, in which he expressed his intention to address the issue of his paternity privately and in accordance with the relevant legal procedures. However, his statement generated discontent in Magaly Medina who did not take well to the way the situation was handled.
Magaly Medina against Thony Valencia
Last night, Magaly Medina, in his program, he expressed his disagreement with the position of the singer of the Group 5, arguing that their goal appears to be to delay the matter so that the public loses sight of the scandal. Likewise, he regretted that the minor’s mother had been forced to make the situation public, after Tony Valencia I would ignore her.
“If he had been a responsible man, that child would not be exposed to the media. The mother resorted to this because her claims and requests were not taken seriously (…) How much longer is that baby going to wait to have the surname that belongs to her and an allowance and food that she should also have by rights? ‘Magpie’ questioned.
In addition, Magaly Medina focused his criticism on the Group 5, wondering why they continue to support the singer despite the serious accusations he faces. The host expressed that this situation could harm the reputation of the popular musical group.
“It amazes me that a boy who belongs to such a beloved group is the reflection of irresponsible parents. “He does not deserve to be supported by a group made up of men with such a respected career,” he added in this regard.
He does not consider that he should continue in Group 5
On the other hand, Magaly Medina urged Tony Valencia to take charge of their responsibilities, underlining the importance of facing the repercussions of their actions. “He is not a worthy person,” he declared about the singer.
Let us remember that Tony Valencia after the accusation of Laura Zurita in the program Magaly Medina issued a statement asking for complete privacy in this case. Given this, the journalist attacked: “If he had been a responsible man who had faced his responsibilities, as every man must face, that child would not have been exposed to the media.”